However, correct rejection rates were much higher for sequential than simultaneous lineups.
2.
Power analysis is appropriate when the concern is with the correct rejection, or not, of a null hypothesis.
3.
A sequential lineup presentation resulted in a greater difference between children and adults for correct rejections compared to a simultaneous lineup presentation.
4.
Although they explored this area, the results showed that even with identification practice / training, a child witnesses correct rejection rates did not increase.
5.
Similarly, Pozzulo and Lindsay s studies, among many others, have found that children have little to no accuracy in making correct rejections in facial recognition studies.
6.
In adults, sequential lineups aid in correct rejection target-absent lineups; however, they do not help children, but actually result in fewer correct rejections made by children.
7.
In adults, sequential lineups aid in correct rejection target-absent lineups; however, they do not help children, but actually result in fewer correct rejections made by children.
8.
That way the correct rejection of the null hypothesis ( here : of no difference made by the treatment ) can become much more likely, with statistical power increasing simply because the random between-patient variation has now been eliminated.